Skip to main content

Full text of "John Barclay of Perth Amboy : the scion of an illustrious house"

See other formats


92  9.2 

B23505r 

2007225 


REYNOLDS  HISTORICAL 
GENEALOGY  COLLECTION 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2018 


https://archive.org/details/johnbarclayofperOOrubi 


V  -  - - -  ~  / 

J*  «,*  Jt 

JOHN  BARCLAY  OF  PERTH  AMBOY 
The  Scion  of  an  Illustrious  House 

BY  MILTON  RUBINCAM,*  WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 


7  3  611  6  i7 


m  MfvO 


NT 

I  3 


_/ 


Rubincam,  Milton,  1909-  ^ 

John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy;  the  scion  of  an  illustrious 
house,  by  Milton  Rubincam  ...  ^Washington,  1940j 

cover-title,  S£T  p.  23m.  ^  ■  QOS-  ~  Q  I  b  }  0-5  ^  -  <Q  6  ^ 

-from  July  and  October  Issues,  Proceedings  of  the  New 
Jersey  historical  society.”  'b~v-b-  o  ^ ,  J  4  */  0 
Bibliographical  foot-notes. 


1.  Barclay  family.  2.  Barclay,  John,  1650-1731. 


CS71.B25  1040 


» 


40-20601 


Library  of  Congress 


- - - proceedings  Nezv  Jersey  Historical  Society 

white  gum  which  oozes'tnM»4]iele^  also  eaten. 

Great  quantities  of  the dried  by  the 
Indians  and  stoi^d-^farHuture  use.  FamisheJ^drite^avelers 
and  India^Hiunters  would  often  live  for  many  days  on  the^Tmt 
afrdstems  of  the  opuntia. 

(To  be  continued) 

&  &  £  S 

JOHN  BARCLAY  OF  PERTH  AMBOY 
The  Scion  of  an  Illustrious  House 

BY  MILTON  RUBINCAM,*  WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 

The  old  Province  of  East  New  Jersey  was  peopled  exten¬ 
sively  by  Scottish  pioneers.  Many  of  their  family  names  are 
identical  with  those  borne  by  distinguished  families  in  Scotland, 
but  the  precise  connection,  if  any,  is  not  always  ascertainable. 
On  the  other  hand,  contemporary  evidence  linking  immigrants 
with  the  main  stocks  in  the  Mother  Country  has  occasionally 
been  preserved  in  New  Jersey  records,  with  the  result  that 
accurate  genealogies  extending  in  some  instances  back  to  the 
twelfth  century  may  be  drawn  up.  A  recent  case  is  that  of 
Thomas  Gordon,  Chief  Justice  of  New  Jersey.* 1  On  the  other 
hand  the  eminent  historian  of  East  Jersey,  Whitehead,  has 
asserted  that  the  immigrants,  John  and  Archibald  Campbell, 
were  the  sons  of  Lord  Neil  Campbell,  Governor  of  East  New 
Jersey,  who  descended  from  the  ancient  and  noble  House  of 
Argyll.2  But  there  is  no  evidence  for  this  statement.  Lord  Neil’s 
issue  are  known.  He  was  the  father  of  four  sons  and  five 
daughters.  Among  the  sons  was  an  Archibald,  who,  it  is  true, 
was  an  East  Jersey  landowner,  but  he  never  settled  permanently 

♦Corresponding  Secretary,  Natonal  Genealogical  Society.  ' 

1  Milton  Rubincam,  “The  Honorable  Thomas  Gordon:  Attorney  Gen¬ 
eral  and  Chief  Justice,”  Proceedings  of  the  New  Jersey  Historical  Soci¬ 
ety,  July,  1939,  pp.  147-150. 

2William  A.  Whitehead,  Contributions  to  the  Early  History  of  Perth 
Amboy  and  Adjoining  Country  (1856),  p.  22. 


*1*  which  *r$u£  ibfh  V  wzU  :p‘Ynk*'i  $  (<i  '<bv«c 

Mpu&vmt  *iMt\b  ion  21  -  cuff  ii  M\*rxW*  wfc  m# 

. 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


203 


in  the  country,  afterwards  became  a  Bishop  of  the  Episcopal 
Church  of  Scotland,3  and  died  in  1744,  forty-two  years  after  the 
death  of  the  other  Archibald  Campbell  of  East  Jersey.  Lord 
Neil  had  no  son  named  John.  Thus,  any  claim  the  present 
representatives  of  these  two  brothers  might  make  to  a  descent 
from  the  House  of  Argyll  would  be  based  upon  a  false  assump¬ 
tion.4 

The  Barclays  of  East  Jersey  are  among  the  more  fortunate 
families,  for  their  immigrating  ancestor  represented  one  of  the 
oldest  houses  in  Scotland  and  was  a  brother  of  Robert  Barclay, 
The  Apologist,  Governor  of  East  Jersey.  The  Governor’s 
ancestry  has  been  thoroughly  searched  out  and  documented,5  but 
to  dispel  all  doubts  that  may  arise  concerning  the  authenticity 
of  the  descent  of  the  American  family  from  the  great  Scottish 
House  of  Barclay,  the  following  calendar  of  evidences  is  pre¬ 
sented,  proving  the  relationship  of  John  Barclay  of  Perth 
Amboy  to  Governor  Robert  Barclay,  the  son  of  Colonel  David 
Barclay,  Laird  of  Urie : 

1684,  July  10:  Deed.  Robert  Barclay,  Governour  and 
one  of  the  Proprietors,  to  his  brother  John  Barclay  for  500 
acres  of  the  first  division  of  10,000  acres.6 

1684,  - - :  Power  of  attorney.  Andrew  Jeffery  of 

Kingswells,  Scotland,  to  John  Barclay,  son  of  David  Bar¬ 
clay  of  Urie,  as  land  agent  in  East  Jersey.7 

1685/6,  Jan.  18:  Confirmatory  Patent  to  John  Barclay 
of  Amboy  Perth,  for  700  acres,  500  thereof  being  for  the 


3Sir  James  Balfour  Paul,  Lyon  King  of  Arms,  The  Scots  Peerage, 
vol.  I  (1904),  p.  360. 

4An  investigation  is  planned  to  determine,  if  possible,  the  true  par¬ 
entage  of  John  and  Archibald  Campbell,  of  East  Jersey.  Persons  who 
possess  original  documents  or  other  source-material  that  may  shed  light 
on  the  problem  are  cordially  invited  to  communicate  them  to  the  writer. 
Due  credit  will  be  given  for  assistance  rendered. 

5A  History  of  the  Barclay  Family,  Part  I  by  Rev.  Charles  W.  Bar¬ 
clay  (1924),  Part  II  by  Lieut-Col.  Hubert  F.  Barclay  (1933),  and  Part 
III  by  Lieut. -Col.  Hubert  F.  Barclay  and  Alice  Wilson-Fox  (1934). 
For  the  sake  of  convenience,  this  monumental  work  will  be  referred  to 
hereafter  as  Barclay  Fam.  Flist. 

GNezv  Jersey  Archives,  1st  series,  vol.  XXI,  Calendar  of  Records,  p. 
66.  This  great  source  work  will  be  referred  to  in  the  notes  as  NJA. 

7NJA,  XXI,  p.  182. 


. 

•  ■■  ■  I 

It  ifiiir  KLj >  j  t> 


' 


i#  •<!  ,(i« 


* 


204  Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 

like  quantity  purchased  from  his  brother  Robert  Barclay, 
the  other  200  being  headland  for  himself  and  six  servants.8 

1688,  May  1  :  Power  of  attorney.  Andrew  Galloway  of 
Aberdeen,  Scotland,  merchant,  to  John  Barclay,  second  son 
of  Colonel  David  Barclay,  of  Urie,  as  “actor,  factor,  com¬ 
missioner  and  special  errand  bearer  in  East  Jersey.9 

1731,  April  29:  Obituary.  “From  Amboy  we  hear,  that 
last  Week  died  Mr.  John  Barclay,  Post-master  there.  He 
was  Brother  to  the  famous  Robert  Barclay}0 

The  Barclay  family  is  said* 11  to  have  been  of  Norman  origin, 
and  to  have  migrated  from  England  to  Scotland  soon  after  the 
Conquest,  in  the  retinue  of  the  Saxon  princess,  Margaret,  who 
was  on  her  way  to  wed  Malcolm  III  (Ceannmor),  King  of 
Scots.12  The  family  grew  and  prospered  in  their  new  home, 
acquired  immense  landed  possessions,  and  ranked  high  among 
the  Scottish  armigerous  families.  Chief  among  the  main  stock’s 
offshoots  were  the  Barclays  of  Towie,  Gartly,  Collairnie,  Kil- 
birnie,  Ladyland,  Pierston,  Mathers,  and  Urie.  A  representa¬ 
tive  of  the  Pierston  line  was  Sir  Robert  Barclay,  who  was  cre¬ 
ated  a  Baronet  of  Nova  Scotia  in  1668.  His  eighth  lineal  de¬ 
scendant  is  the  present  head  of  the  House  of  Pierston,  Sir  Col¬ 
ville  Herbert  Sanford  Barclay,  14th  Baronet.13 

Alexander  de  Berkeley,  seventh  in  direct  descent  from  the 
founder  of  the  Scottish  family  of  Barclay  (formerly  Berkeley),14 
married,  in  1351,  Katherine,  the  daughter  of  Sir  Edward  Keith, 
and  sister  of  Sir  William  Keith,  hereditary  Marischal  of  Scot¬ 
land,  who  bestowed  upon  his  sister  and  her  husband  the  lands 
of  Wester  Mathers  as  a  wedding  gift.15  The  succeeding  twelve 
generations  of  the  Mathers  line  were  relatively  undistinguished. 
They  maintained  their  position  as  landed  gentry,  and  married 
into  families  of  equal  rank. 

*NJA,  XXI,  p.  76. 

*NJA,  XXI,  p  201. 

10NJA,  XI,  Newspaper  Extracts,  I,  p.  243. 

11 Barclay  Fam.  Hist.,  1,  pp.  13  14 
12Ibid.,  II,  pp.  5-6. 

13Burke,s  Peerage,  Baronetage,  and  Knightage,  p.  21 1.  A  discussion 
of  some  of  the  numerous  foreign  ramifications  of  the  family  will  be 
found  in  the  Genealogical  Notes  at  the  conclusion  of  this  article. 

14  Bar  clay  Fam.  Hist.,  I,  charts  on  pp.  iii,  iv. 

15Jbid.,  II,  pp.  IS3-I54- 


■ 

. 

' 

*  Hr  14  t  \>yN 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


205 


Keith,  who  presented  him  with  a  son,  Captain  James,  and  a 
daughter,  Anne,  who  was  the  wife  successively  of  Douglas  of 
Till i whilly,  Robert  Irvine  (brother  of  the  Laird  of  Drum),  and 
the  Rev.  David  Strachan,  afterwards  Bishop  of  Brechin. 

The  third  son  by  the  first  wife,  Colonel  David  Barclay  (1610- 
1686),  upheld  the  military  traditions  of  his  house  by  his  distin¬ 
guished  services  as  a  soldier.  In  his  youth  he  served  in  the 
Swedish  army  under  the  great  King  Gustaf  (II)  Adolf.  For 
his  gallantry  in  the  battle  of  Liitzen — in  which  the  mighty  Scam 
dinavian  hero  and  champion  of  Protestantism  lost  his  life — he 
was  commissioned  a  captain.16  After  attaining  the  rank  of  major 
in  the  Swedish  army,  he  returned  to  Scotland  in  1638,  owing  to 
the  unrest  that  was  rapidly  sweeping  his  native  land.  He  entered 
the  Parliamentary  Army,  in  which  he  became  a  colonel.  He 
commanded  a  troop  of  horse  in  the  battle  of  Philiphaugh,  near 
Selkirk  (September  13,  1645),  in  which  the  great  Royalist  gen¬ 
eral,  James  Graham,  Marquis  of  Montrose,  was  disastrously 
beaten.17  This  day,  which  ordinarily  would  have  been  one  of 
great  rejoicing  for  Colonel  Barclay,  was  turned  into  a  day  of 
mourning,  for  his  younger  half-brother,  Captain  James  Barclay 
(who  served  in  his  regiment),  lost  his  life. 

In  December,  1647,  Colonel  Barclay  married  Katherine,  the 
daughter  of  Sir  Robert  Gordon,  1st  Baronet,  of  Gordonstoun. 
This  was  a  most  illustrious  match,  one  that  reacted  favorably 
on  the  fortunes  of  this  almost  impoverished  branch  of  the  Bar¬ 
clays.  Sir  Robert  Gordon  (1580-1656)  had  been  created  the 
premier  Baronet  of  Nova  Scotia  on  May  28,  1625,  and,  in  addi¬ 
tion,  the  Crown  had  granted  him  an  estate  of  16,000  acres  on 
the  coast  of  Nova  Scotia,  “which  was  erected  in  a  full  and  free 
barony,  called  the  barony  of  Gordon,  with  power  of  regality.”18 
During  the  next  few  years  Sir  Robert  had  acquired  a  number 
of  estates  in  Elginshire  and  elsewhere,  and  on  June  20,  1642,  he 
had  them  all  united  into  the  Barony  of  Gordonstoun.  He  is 
chiefly  remembered  for  his  great  work,  the  Genealogical  History 

1GBarclay  Fam.  Hist.,  Ill,  p.  3. 

l7The  Historians’  History  of  the  World ,  vol.  XX,  “The  History  of 
England,”  p.  39. 

18 Dictionary  of  National  Biography,  vol.  XXII,  p.  225.  To  be  known 
as  DNB. 


f11  1  h  m  >£i\ 

**' 4)  “•*  *■»  a  t  ,  ^if., 

. 


206  Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 

of  the  Earldom  of  Sutherland,  from  its  Origin  to  the  Year  1630, 
which  Gilbert  Gordon  of  Sallach  continued  to  1651. 

By  his  fortunate  alliance  with  Katherine  Gordon,  Colonel 
Barclay  united  his  family  with  some  of  the  most  powerful  clans 
in  Scotland.  The  Gordons  had  been  influential  in  national  and 
international  affairs  since  the  twelfth  century,  but  the  branch 
of  which  the  new  Mrs.  Barclay  was  a  member  had  occupied  the 
earldom  of  Sutherland  since  the  early  part  of  the  sixteenth  cen- 
'tury,  as  the  lineal  heirs  of  the  original  House  of  Sutherland, 
which  had  become  extinct  in  the  main  line  in  1514.  Her  great¬ 
grandfather,  John  Gordon,  xoth  Earl  of  Sutherland,  married  for 
his  second  wife,  Helenor  Stewart,  daughter  of  John,  3rd  Earl 
of  Lennox,19  a  cadet  of  the  royal  house  of  Scotland,  which 
ascended  the  throne  of  England  in  1603.  Their  son,  Alexander, 
the  nth  Earl,  married  (secondly)  the  Lady  Jean  Gordon, 
daughter  of  George,  4th  Earl  of  Huntly,  and  they  were  the 
parents  of  Sir  Robert  Gordon,  of  Gordonstoun.  Sir  Robert’s 
wife,  Louise,  daughter  of  John  Gordon,  D.D.,  was  a  great-great- 
granddaughter  of  James  IV,  King  of  Scots,  who  gave  up  his  life 
while  fighting  valiantly  on  the  bloody  field  of  Flodden  in  15 13. 20 

The  year  following  his  marriage  to  Katherine  Gordon,  Colonel 
Barclay  acquired  an  estate  of  his  own,  Urie,  in  Kincardineshire, 
of  which  he  became  the  first  Laird.  Through  the  influence  of 
the  noble  House  of  Sutherland  he  was  elected  a  member  of 
Parliament  for  Sutherlandshire  in  1649,  a°d  later  for  the  shires 
of  Angus  and  Mearns.21  Several  years  after  the  restoration  to 
the  throne  of  the  House  of  Stuart  in  1660,  he  was  imprisoned  in 
Edinburgh,  no  doubt  because  of  his  former  associations  with  the 
Parliamentarians,  but  was  released  through  the  intercession  of 
his  good  friend,  John,  Earl  Middleton.22  While  in  prison  he 
became  interested  in  the  doctrines  of  the  Society  of  Friends,  and 
in  1666  he  openly  espoused  Quakerism.  His  newly-adopted 
religious  convictions  were  sufficient  to  land  him  in  prison  again, 

which  they  did  in  1668.  His  petitions  for  liberty  were  ignored 

— ~ 

10The  Scots  Peerage,  vol.  VIII,  p.  342. 

20For  proofs  of  the  royal  descent  see  the  Genealogical  Notes  following 
the  article. 

21  Barclay  Fam.  Hist.,  Ill,  pp.  35-36. 

22 DNB,  III,  p.  168. 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


20  7 


because  he  refused  to  sign  a  bond  to  keep  the  peace,  and  he  was 
confined  in  the  tolbooth23  at  Montrose.  His  confinement  was 
not  very  strict,  however,  and  he  was  permitted  to  retire  to  his 
home  at  Urie,  his  leave  there  being  extended  at  various  times, 
and  on  August  23,  1670,  he  was  granted  his  full  liberty.24 

Colonel  David  Barclay  and  Katherine  Gordon  were  the  par¬ 
ents  of  three  sons  and  two  daughters,  namely :  Robert,  John 
(afterwards  of  Perth  Amboy),  David,  Lucy  (unmarried),  and 
Jean  (married  Sir  Ewen  Cameron,  Laird  of  Lochiel25).  The 
eldest  son  and  heir,  Robert  Barclay,  received  his  education  in 
France  and  Scotland,  and  became  proficient  in  the  use  of  the 
French,  Latin,  Greek,  and  Hebrew  tongues.  For  a  time  it  was 
feared  that,  under  the  influence  of  an  uncle  and  namesake  who 
was  a  priest  in  France,  he  would  turn  Catholic,  but  eventually 
he  realized  the  merit  of  the  Quaker  faith  and  was  not  long  in 
joining  his  father  as  a  member  of  the  Society  of  Friends,  of 
which  he  became  one  of  the  most  noted  champions.  Like  his 
father,  he  was  imprisoned  for  his  convictions,  but  on  January 
2,  1673,  the  Privy  Council  of  Scotland  set  him  at  liberty.26  He 
was  the  author  of  numerous  works,  but  his  masterpiece  was  An 
Apology  for  the  True  Christian  Divinity,  as  the  same  is  held 
forth  and  preached  by  the  People,  in  scorn,  called  Quakers, 
which  was  originally  published  in  Latin  in  1675.  but  has  since 
undergone  numerous  English  editions.  It  is  unquestionably  the 
finest  exposition  of  the  principles  of  the  Society  of  Friends  that 
ever  has  been  presented  to  the  public,  and  has  won  immortality 
for  Robert  Barclay  as  The  Apologist.  Since  February,  1670,  he 
had  been  married  to  Christian,  the  daughter  of  Gilbert  Mollison, 
of  Aberdeen,  and  as  a  wedding  gift  Colonel  Barclay  gave  the 
Urie  estate  to  Robert  and  his  bride,  but  the  aging  soldier  con¬ 
tinued  to  reside  there  from  time  to  time  until  his  death,  which 
occurred  in  1686.  Thus,  long  before  he  would  normally  have 


23In  Scotland  the  tolbooth  is  the  city  jail. 

24The  Regisetr  of  the  Privy  Council  of  Scotland,  3rd  series,  II,  pp. 
424,  428,  432-433,  457,  565;  HI,  PP-  13,  51-  (Hereinafter  referred  to  as 
Reg.  P.  C.  Sc.). 

25For  an  account  of  this  turbulent  Highland  warrior,  see  the  Genea- 
logcal  Notes,  at  the  end. 

26Reg.  P.  C.  Sc.,  IV,  p.  1. 


2o8  Proceedings  Nezv  Jersey  Historical  Society 

The  eleventh  and  last  Laird  of  Mathers,  David  Barclay  (1580- 
1660),  was  forced  to  dispose  of  his  estates  in  order  to  fulfill  his 
many  financial  obligations.  He  was  twice  married,  his  first  wife 
being  Elizabeth,  the  daughter  of  Sir  John  Livingston,  of  Duni- 
pace,  by  whom  he  had  four  sons,  John,  Alexander,  David,  and 
Robert ;  and  his  second  wife,  Margaret,  daughter  of  Alexander 
inherited  the  property,  The  Apologist  became  the  second  Laird 
of  Uyie. 

As  a  close  personal  friend  of  William  Penn,  Barclay  became 
naturally  interested  in  the  colonization  schemes  of  the  great 
English  Quaker,  and  he  and  his  younger  brother,  David,  were 
quickly  enrolled  among  the  proprietors  of  East  Jersey.  On 
March  14,  1682-83,  “his  Royal  Highness  the  most  illustrious 
Prince  James,  Duke  of  York  and  Albany,  Earl  of  Ulster,  &c. 
only  Brother  to  our  Sovereign  Lord  the  King,”  was  pleased  to 
grant  the  Province  of  East  New  Jersey  to  twenty-four  pro¬ 
prietors,  headed  by  James,  Earl  of  Perth,  his  brother,  the  Hon. 
John  Drummond  of  Lundy  (afterwards  Viscount  Melfort), 
“Robert  Barclay,  of  Eury,  in  the  said  Kingdom  of  Scotland, 
Esq,”  and  “ David  B archly,  jun.  of  Eury,  aforesaid,  Esq.”  The 
other  Scottish  proprietors  were  Robert  Gordon,  of  Cluny,  and 
Arent  Sonmans,27  of  Wallingford.  Then  followed  the  names  of 
the  English  proprietors,  the  first  on  the  list  being  that  of  “ Wil¬ 
liam  Penn  of  Worminghurst,  in  the  County  of  Sussex,  Esq.”28 
On  July  17,  1683,  the  proprietors  elected  Robert  Barclay  Gov¬ 
ernor  of  East  Jersey,  to  hold  office  for  life.29  There  were  too 
many  matters  engaging  his  attention  at  home  to  permit  him  to 
take  up  a  residence  in  the  colony,  with  the  result  that  he  ap¬ 
pointed  Gawen  Laurie  to  serve  as  his  deputy  in  the  province.30 
But  the  real  chief  executive  was  Governor  Barclay. 

John  Barclay,  the  second  son  of  Colonel  David  Barlcay,  be¬ 
came  as  interested  in  the  Quaker  experiments  as  his  brothers, 
and  probably  about  1684  he  emigrated  to  East  Jersey.  On  April 

27For  the  story  of  an  attempt  upon  the  life  of  Robert  Barclay  and  the 
fatal  assault  upon  Arent  Sonmans,  see  the  writer’s  article,  “The  Strange 
Career  of  Peter  Sonmans,”  Procs.  N.  J.  Hist.  Soc.,  October,  1939.  P-  236. 

28NJA,  1st  ser.,  I,  pp.  383-384. 

20Ibid.f  I,  423-424. 

30Ibid.,  I,  423-425- 


.it*.  >  ’ 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


209 


21  of  that  year,  Robert  Barclay  deeded  to  his  brother,  David, 
one-tenth  of  a  one-forty-eighth  share  in  East  Jersey.31  A  record 
of  December  1,  1684,  shows  that  John  Barclay  brought  the  fol¬ 
lowing  servants  into  the  province :  indentured  for  four  years, 
John  Browne,  shoemaker,  and  John  Salton,  tailor;  indentured 
for  two  years,  Gawen  Murhead  (Muirhead  ?),  John  Garner, 
and  John  Harper.32  Original  papers  which  are  now  preserved 
in  the  archives  of  the  New  Jersey  Historical  Society  show  that 
John  Barclay  acted  as  land  agent  in  East  Jersey  for  Robert 
Gordon,  of  Cluny,  and  Robert  Burnet,  of  Lethenty,  Scotland,33 
among  others.  In  1685,  David  Barclay,  Jr.,  sailed  from  Aber¬ 
deen  aboard  the  ship  America ,  of  Stockton  (Captain  Vivers, 
master),  but  he  died  at  sea  in  the  latter  part  of  August.  His 
share  of  the  province  reverted  to  Governor  Robert,  who  deeded 
it  to  his  brother,  John,  on  March  8,  1686-87.  He  authorized 
John  to  act  as  his  land  agent  in  America.34  Earlier,  on  Janu¬ 
ary  4,  1685-86,  John  had  been  granted  letters  of  administration 
on  the  estate  of  his  brother,  David.35 

Robert  Barclay  was  a  great  favorite  of  the  Duke  of  York, 
who  succeeded  Charles  II  as  King  in  February,  1685.  The 
candid  opinion  of  the  new  monarch,  James  II,  was  frankly  ex¬ 
pressed  in  a  letter  dated  at  Whitehall,  July  16,  1685,  and  ad¬ 
dressed  to  the  Marquess  of  Queensberry,  Lord  Treasurer  of 
Scotland  :36 

i 

“Tho’  I  haue  not  great  reson  to  be  well  satisfyed  with  the 
Quakers  in  general,  yet  I  look  on  this  bearer,  Robert 
Barkley,  to  be  well  affected  to  me ;  so  that  I  would  have  you 
shew  him  what  countence  is  reasonable,  and  not  lett  him 
suffer  for  the  faults  of  others  of  his  perswation,  which  is  all 
I  shall  say  now.” 


3Hbid.,  XXI,  p.  69. 

S2Ibid.,  XXI,  p.  62. 

33“Unpublished  Scots  East  Jersey  Proprietors’  MSS.”  ( Procs .  N.  J. 
Hist.  Soc.,  Jan.,  19 22,  pp.  11-12;  April,  1922,  pp.  1 19- 120). 

34NJA,  1st  ser.,  XXI,  p.  308. 

35Ibid.,  XXI,  p.  69. 

3GGreat  Britain:  Historical  Manuscripts  Commission,  15th  report:  The 
MSS.  of  His  Grace  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  and  Queensbury ,  K.  G.,  K.  T., 
Preserved  at  Drumlanrig  (1897),  vol.  I,  p.  215. 


l\  t 


:o  a&v;<SPifi  if'  m 


'  fii  '  •  •  r  r j  f J  >  -;v  •  hi 


210 


Proceedings  Nezv  Jersey  Historical  Society 


About  this  time  Governor  Barclay  was  making  plans  to  in¬ 
crease  the  population  of  his  province,  and  one  way  of  doing  it 
was  to  transport  prisoners  overseas.  The  Privy  Council  of 
Scotland,  consisting  of  the  Lord  High  Chancellor,  the  Lord 
High  Treasurer,  the  Marquess  of  Douglas,  the  Earl  of  Drum- 
lanrig,  the  Earl  of  Panmuir,  the  Earl  of  Kintore,  the  Viscount 
Tarbut,  the  Lord  Livingston,  the  Lord  Advocate,  the  Lord  Jus¬ 
tice  Clerk,  and  the  Lord  Castlehill,  was  in  session  at  Edinburgh 
on  July  30,  1685,  when  a  petition  was  received  from  Robert 
Barclay  of  Urie,  stating  that  the  supplicant 

“hes  immediately  lying  on  the  road  at  Leith  a  ship  bound¬ 
ing  for  East  New  Jerseye  in  America,  and  seeing  there  are 
severall  prisoners  now  in  the  prisons  who  are  troublesome 
to  the  government  to  maintain,  therefor  humbly  supplicat¬ 
ing  the  Councill  to  allow  the  number  of  tuentie  four  of  them 
to  be  transported  by  the  supplicant  to  the  said  plantation  on 
his  finding  surety  in  the  ordinary  termes  and  releiveing  the 
government  instantly  of  the  trouble  of  them.  The  Lords  of 
his  Majesties  Privy  Councill,  haveing  considered  the  for- 
said  petition,  doe  allow  the  petitioner  to  have  tuentie  four 
of  these  persons  sentenced  to  the  plantations  upon  the  cau¬ 
tion  thereby  ordered.37 

The  next  day  the  Council  ordered  the  prisoners  to  be  deliv¬ 
ered  to  Barclay,  and  named  them  as  follows  :38 

“George  Young,  Robert  Cameron,  John  Gib,  James 
Stewart,  John  Suan,  James  Olipher,  John  Jackson,  Coline 
Campble,  John  Campble,  Gilbert  Ferguson,  prisoners  in  the 
tolbooth  of  the  Canongate;  John  Gilliland,  Archbald  Jame- 
.  son,  William  McIlroy,  William  Brenan,  Thomas  Richard, 
prisoners  in  the  tolbooth  of  Edinburgh  or  in  the  Laigh 
Parliament  House ;  William  Thomsone,  Malcom  Black, 
Alexander  Grahame,  Donald  Moore,  John  Nicoll,  John 
McCallum,  John  McKello,  Duncan  McEwan,  prisoners  in 
Pauls  Hospitall.”39 

31Reg.  P.  C.  Sc.,  3rd  ser.,  XI,  p.  127. 

38Ibid.,  XI,  pp.  130-131. 

39Possible  descendants  of  the  above-named  24  persons  should  not  be 
embarrassed  at  the  revelation  that  their  families  were  founded  by  inmates 
of  Edinburgh’s  principal  jails.  Although  the  cause  of  their  incarceration 
is  not  stated,  it  is  very  likely  that  they  were  not  imprisoned  for  crimes 
of  violence,  but  for  religious  reasons. 


>  i:  ntfo. >  -i4  on  .  •  :>•-  >v" 

:  j  '  )  h.  i  i'-  a  <j  t  ’i<  1/  >f.!t  ,t  in.  ivj  i'I  r^.:  I 

' 

■  ' 

£  ’1-  li' 


' 

* •  :  1  ••  u.!,  fcri‘  ,  .»  &l:  »li  V.  HI  l:  :•  .!(;  tii. I‘>\ 

I  ju<  nfi 


■ 

ii 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


211 


In  this  same  year  (1685)  King  James  formally  confirmed  the 
Barclays’  possession  of  the  Barony  of  Urie.  John  Barclay,  who 
was  then  in  New  Jersey,  was  not  overlooked  in  the  summary  of 
the  succession  to  the  estate.  This  imposing  document  is  too 
long  to  be  quoted  in  its  entirety  in  this  place,  but  the  intro¬ 
ductory  remarks  are  of  interest  :40 

“Our  Soveraigne  Lord  with  advice  and  consent  of  His 
Estates  of  Parliament  ffor  the  good  and  faithful  Services 
done  and  performed  to  His  Majesty  and  His  most  Royal 
progenitors  By  Colonel  David  Barclay  of  Urie  and  Robert 
Barclay  his  eldest  Lawfull  Son  In  times  past  by  thir  pres¬ 
ents  Ratifys  approves  and  perpetually  confirms  ane  Chartor 
Dated  at  Windsore  Castle  the  therteenth  day  of  August 
Im  vjc*  seventy  nyn  yeares  Granted  by  His  late  Majesty 
King  Charles  the  Second  of  ever  blessed  memory  wherby 
H  is  Highness  with  consent  of  the  Lords  of  the  Thesaury 
and  Exchequer  of  His  ancient  Kingdom  of  Scotland  His 
Majesties  Commissioners  for  the  time  Gave  Granted 
Disposed  and  for  His  Highness  and  his  Successors  per¬ 
petually  confirmed  to  the  said  Collonel  David  Barclay  in 
Liferent  during  all  the  days  of  his  Lifetime  And  to  the  said 
Robert  Barclay  his  Son  and  aires  Lawfully  procreat  or  to 
be  procreat  of  His  body  whilks  failing  to  John  Barclay 
Second  Lawfull  Son  to  the  said  Collonel  and  aires  Lawfully 
to  be  procreat  of  His  body  whilks  failing  to  David  Barclay 
youngest  Lawfull  Son  to  the  said  Collonel  and  aires  of  His 
body  whilks  failing  to  Lucie  and  Jean  Barclays  Lawfull 
Daughters  to  the  said  Collonel  (all  procreat  betuixt  him 
and  Catharine  Gordon  his  Spouse)  be  equall  portions  and 
aires  of  their  body.  .  . 

John  Barclay  participated  actively  in  the  affairs  of  East  Jersey 
almost  from  the  first  day  of  his  settlement  there.  On  April  14, 
1687,  he,  with  the  other  leading  proprietors,  Thomas  Gordon, 
Robert  Fullerton,  Thomas  Warne,  Andrew  Hamilton,  and 
Gawen  Laurie,  commissioned  Samuel  Winder,  John  Campbell 
and  Miles  Forster  to  confer  with  the  Governor  of  West  Jersey 
relative  to  running  the  line  between  the  twin  provinces  of  East 
and  West  Jersey.41  On  January  1,  1688-89,  he  was  appointed 
to  the  post  of  Deputy  Surveyor  of  the  Province,  to  serve  under 

40The  Acts  of  the  Parliaments  of  Scotland,  vol.  VIII  (1820),  p.  531. 

4XNJA,  1st  ser.,  II,  pp.  1-2. 


>.iv;  'VgbucI  mfol  .sh-j-  1(1  vn^n.».&  5*h  to'ftoifg’Jteof  '*X  fcnaff 


t«*il  Mil  Uu  i 


t  1*1 


r/-/A  V* 


*  ,.»»  \*b  » H 

•  •  1 


<•  J  I«  Iff,  <V/  :.  ’ 


212  Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 

the  celebrated  George  Keith,  the  Surveyor.42  On  January  7, 
1692,  he  became  Receiver-General,  and  on  April  6,  1692,  the 
proprietors  in  England  appointed  him  Receiver-General  and 
Surveyor-General.  On  the  reverse  side  of  his  commission  was 
written  the  oath  taken  by  him : 

“I  the  within  named  John  Barclay  doe  hereby  Solemnly 
promise  to  beare  true  allegeance  to  King  William  and 
Queen  Marie43  King  &  Queen  over  England  &c  theire 
heires  and  Successors,  and  be  true  and  faithfull  to  the 
interest  of  the  Lords  Proprietors  of  the  Province  of  East 
New  Jersey  and  to  theire  heires  Executors  &  assignes,  and 
I  will  endeavour  the  peace  and  welfare  of  the  said  Province 
And  I  will  well  and  faithfully  discharge  the  office  of  sur¬ 
veyor  generall  in  the  said  Province,  And  doe  equall  Justice 
unto  all  men  according  to  my  best  skill  and  Judgment  with¬ 
out  corruption  favour  or  affection  witness  my  hand  this 
first  day  of  the  month  called  November  1692. ”44 

On  November  2,  1692,  he  was  elected  a  member  of  the  Gen¬ 
eral  Assembly  for  Perth  Amboy,45  and  on  December  1,  1698,  he 
was  reelected  as  a  representative  of  Middlesex  County.46  Other 
offices  held  by  him  prior  to  the  union  of  the  twin  provinces  of 
East  and  West  Jersey  were:  Deputy  Secretary  and  Register  of 
the  Province  (November  25,  1695),  Commissioner  of  the  Court 
of  Small  Debts  (May  4,  1696),  Register  of  the  Court  of  Chan¬ 
cery  (August  6,  1698),  Commissioner  of  the  Court  of  Small 
Causes  (December  1,  1698),  and  Clerk  of  the  Court  of  Common 
Rights  or  the  Supreme  or  Provincial  Court  of  the  Province 
(February  5,  1699). 47  Towards  the  close  of  the  century  he  was 
Town  Clerk  of  Perth  Amboy,  for  on  April  25,  1699,  we  find  him 
signing  (in  that  capacity)  a  letter  addressed  to  the  home  govern¬ 
ment  relative  to  the  questionable  conduct  of  Jeremiah  Basse, 

42R.  Burnham  Moffat,  The  Barclays  of  New  York:  Who  They  Are  and 
Who  They  Are  Not  (1904),  p.  16.  (Quoting  Liber  C  of  Commissions.) 

43James  II,  the  royal  friend  and  relative  of  the  Barclays,  had  been  de¬ 
posed  in  1688,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son-in-law  and  daughter,  William 
III  and  Mary  II.  His  other  daughter,  Anne,  was  fated  to  be  the  last 
monarch  of  the  adventurous  House  of  Stuart. 

“NJA,  II,  81-84. 

*5Ibid,  XXI,  159. 

™Ibid.,  XXI,  162. 

47Moffat,  supra ,  p.  1 6. 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


213 


who  had  been  Governor  of  East  and  West  Jersey  since  1697.48 
On  June  19,  1701,  he  was  one  of  the  East  Jersey  proprietors 
who  surrendered  the  Government  to  the  Crown.49 

Meanwhile,  Barclay  had  been  undergoing  a  change  of  reli¬ 
gious  convictions,  and  at  the  dawn  of  the  eighteenth  century  he 
completely  departed  from  the  fold  of  the  Society  of  Friends  and 
became  an  avowed  Anglican.  In  1702  his  friend,  George  Keith, 
another  renegade  Quaker  who  had  recently  been  ordained  a 
minister  of  the  Church  of  England,  returned  to  America  as  a 
missionary  of  the  Society  for  the  Propagation  of  the  Gospel  in 
Foreign  Parts.  On  Sunday,  October  3,  1702,  he  delivered  a 
sermon  at  Perth  Amboy.  John  Barclay  was  among  the  leading 
East  Jersey  proprietors  who  attended  the  services.  The  story 
is  best  told  in  Mr.  Keith’s  own  words  :50 

“I  preached  at  Amboy  in  East-Jersey;  the  Auditory  was 
small :  My  Text  was  Tit.  2.11,12.  But  such  as  were  there, 
were  well  affected ;  some  of  them,  of  my  former  Acquaint¬ 
ances,  and  others  who  had  been  formerly  Quakers  but  were 
come  over  to  the  Church,  particularly  Miles  Foster,51  and 
John  Barclay  (Brother  to  Robert  Barclay ,  who  published 
the  Apology  for  the  Quakers)  the  Place  has  very  few  In¬ 
habitants.  We  were  several  Days  kindly  entertained  by 
Miles  Forster  at  his  House  there. ” 

Barclay  afterwards  became  prominent  in  the  affairs  of  St. 
Peter’s  Church  at  Perth  Amboy,  and  held  the  positions  of 
Warden  from  1718  to  1722,  and  Vestryman  from  1730  to  1732. 52 
To  this  day  the  names  of  George  Willocks,  Thomas  Gordon,  and 
John  Barclay  may  be  seen  engraved  on  the  tablet  of  the  bene¬ 
factors  of  St.  Peter’s,  on  the  east  wall  behind  the  pulpit.53 

Queen  Anne,  who  succeeded  her  brother-in-law,  William  III, 
in  1702,  appointed  as  the  first  royal  Governor  of  New  Jersey  her 

48NJA,  II,  pp.  273-275. 

49Ibid.,  II,  pp.  387-390- 

50George  Keith.  A  Journal  of  Travels  from  New  Hampshire  to  Cara- 
tuck,  on  the  Continent  of  North  America  (1706),  pp.  50-51. 

*xi.e.  Forster. 

52Rev.  W.  Northey  Jones,  M.A.,  The  History  of  St.  Peters  Church  in 
Perth  Amboy.  Nnv  Jersey,  The  Oldest  Congregation  of  the  Church  in 
the  State  of  New  Jersey  (1923),  p.  178. 

53 Jones,  supra,  “The  Chalice  of  Queen  Anne”  ( Procs .  N.  J.  Hist.  Soc., 
July,  1917,  p.  155). 


■ 


f  •  i  .  ' 


- 


214  Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 

first  cousin,  Edward  Hyde,  Viscount  Cornbury,  whose  adminis¬ 
tration  (1702-08)  is  chiefly  memorable  for  his  bitter  opposition 
to  the  proprietary  party  and  the  formation  of  his  own  anti¬ 
proprietary  party,  of  which  Peter  Sonmans,  Jeremiah  Basse,  and 
Roger  Mompesson  were  leading  lights.  The  great  Scottish 
families  of  East  Jersey  deemed  it  expedient  to  ally  themselves 
with  the  powerful  Quaker  clans  of  West  Jersey,  and  thus  came 
into  existence  the  celebrated  “Scotch  &  Quaker  factions,”  as 
they  were  called  at  the  time.  Of  the  former,  Thomas  Gordon, 
John  Barclay,  Dr.  John  Johnstone,  and  George  Willocks  were 
the  chieftains,  while  the  Quakers  were  led  by  such  outstanding 
men  as  Samuel  Jennings,  Thomas  Gardiner,  and  John  Hugg,  Jr. 

The  first  consideration  of  the  home  government  was  to  ap¬ 
point  a  Council  to  serve  as  the  upper  house  of  the  Legislature 
and  to  act  as  an  advisory  body  to  the  Governor.  In  1702  the 
Earl  of  Nottingham,  one  of  the  principal  Secretaries  of  State, 
submitted  a  list  of  proprietors  who  were  believed  well  qualified 
to  serve  in  that  capacity.  Then  followed  a  list  of  thirteen  pro¬ 
prietors  who  were  declared  to  be  unfit  for  that  exalted  station, 
“as  being  of  the  Scotch  &  Quaker  Tactions  concerned  sundry 
years  in  ye  divisions  &  incendiary  parties,  that  has  brought  those 
Provinces  into  such  Confusion  of  Governm1.  Injustice  to  ye 
Proprietors  and  aversion  of  ye  Planters  &  Inhabitants.”  The 
name  of  Lewis  Morris,  “ye  Head  of  ye  Taction,”54  headed  this 
secondary  list,  which  included  the  names  of  Samuel  Leonard, 
George  Willocks,  John  Barclay,  Michael  Harden,  Thomas  Gor¬ 
don,  John  Johnstone,  and  others.55  It  is  apparent  that  Corn- 
-  bury’s  supporters  were  carefully  discriminating  in  their  selec¬ 
tions  of  his  advisers. 

The  first  General  Assembly  of  the  new  Province  was  elected 
in  1703,  and  in  the  lower  house,  at  least,  the  proprietors  secured 
a  majority  which  chose  Thomas  Gordon  as  the  first  Speaker. 
John  Barclay  served  in  this  Assembly,  which  formally  convened 
at  Burlington,  September  7,  1704. 56  Prior  to  this  time  he  had 

54Morris,  the  acknowledged  leader  of  the  Scottish  proprietors,  was  of 
Welsh  extraction,  and  belonged  to  a  powerful  proprietary  clan  of  the 
province,  of  New  York,  with  many  interests  in  New  Jersey. 

55NJA,  II,  pp.  487-488. 

56Samuel  Smith,  The  History  of  the  Colony  of  Nova-Caesaria  or  Neiv- 
Jersey  (1765;  reprint,  1877),  p.  283. 


- 

:uiuii  A  OiOfi  > 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy  215 

received  the  commissions  of  Receiver-General  and  Ranger-Gen¬ 
eral  of  New  Jersey  (June  9,  1704). 57 

Barclay’s  commission  of  Receiver  General,  which  had  been 
granted  by  the  Proprietors,  was  approved  by  the  Governor, 
who  later  revoked  it  and  gave  the  post  to  his  faithful  hench¬ 
man,  Peter  Sonmans.  Barclay  obstinately  refused  to  surrender 
his  own  commission  and  boldly  defied  them  to  supplant  him 
in  this  office  (1706).  William  Dockwra,  Secretary  and  Reg¬ 
ister  of  the  .East  Jersey  Proprietors,  addressed  a  memorial  to 
the  Government  on  February  14,  1706,  declaring,  with  con¬ 
siderable  heat,  that  “the  unruly  Scots  and  those  of  their  fac¬ 
tion,  who  are  the  informers  of  the  memoriallists  here  against  the 
Lord  Cornbury”,  opposed  Sonmans’  commission  as  Receiver- 
General.  He  stated  that  Sonmans’  appointment  was  upheld 
by  Cornbury  and  the  Council,  but  “were  these  factions  Pretend¬ 
ers  so  perverse  and  insolent  as  to  incite  one  Barclay,  a  Scotch 
man,  to  persist  in  receiving  the  Quit-rents,  etc.  of  the  Propri¬ 
etors,  he  being  one  of  their  tools.”58 

On  October  24,  1707,  the  then  Speaker  of  the  House,  Samuel 
Jennings,  in  a  ringing  voice  delivered  an  historic  address  to 
His  Excellency,  in  which  he  vigorously  and  daringly  assailed 
the  policies  of  the  administration.  The  Governor  was  reminded 
that  he  himself  had  signed  Barclay’s  commission  and  that  he 
possessed  no  authority  to  transfer  the  office  of  Receiver-Gen¬ 
eral  and  the  custodianship  of  the  proprietary  records  to  Son- 
mans,  as  such  an  act  would  be  contrary  to  the  wishes  of  the 
Proprietors.59 

Barclay  himself  drew  up  a  formal  remonstrance,  reciting 
his  grievance  on  this  score,  and  accused  Cornbury  of  withhold¬ 
ing  his  (Barclay’s)  commission  “most  unjustly  and  Malic¬ 
iously”,  and  he  proved  that  a  second  commission  had  been 
issued  in  his  favor  in  1706  by  the  London  proprietors,  and 
concluded.  “Mr  Barclays  first  Commission  was  under  the 
hands  and  seals  of  A  greater  Number  of  Proprietors  than  Mr. 
Sonmans  sd  Commission  was.”60 

57Mbffat,  supra,  p.  16  (quoting  Liber  I  of  Commissions). 

58 Calendar  of  State  Papers  Preserved  in  The  Public  Record  Office, 
London.  Colonial  Series,  America  and  West  Indies:  1706-1708,  June, 
PP-  50-51. 

50NJA,  1st  ser.,  Ill,  pp.  132,  253-254. 

60Ibid.t  III,  pp.  331-332. 

{To  be  continued ) 


i 


254  Proceedings  Nezv  Jersey  Historical  Society 

JOHN  BARCLAY  OF  PERTH  AMBOY 
The  Scion  of  An  Illustrious  House 

BY  MILTON  RUBINCAM,*  WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 

( Continued  from  page  215) 

At  this  time  Sonmans  was  at  the  peak  of  his  rascally  career, 
and  his  actions  received  the  complete  encouragement  of  Lord 
Cornbury.  But  the  latter’s  heyday  was  rapidly  drawing  to 
its  close,  and  the  nobly  born  Governor’s  recall  paved  the  way 
for  the  much  needed  reforms  planned  by  his  successor,  John, 
Lord  Lovelace,  Baron  of  Hurley.  Barclay’s  friend,  associate 
and  distant  kinsman,  Thomas  Gordon,  who  had  been  shorn  of 
his  honors,  was  restored  to  his  proper  place  in  the  govern¬ 
ment,  and  was  promoted  to  the  high  post  of  Chief  Justice.  On 
March  18,  1708,  he  addressed  himself  to  the  new  Governor, 
delivering  a  stinging  indictment  of  Sonmans,  accusing  him, 
among  other  things,  of  having 

“advised  and  procured  the  arresting  of  Mr  John  Barclay 
on  Whitsunday  last,  coming  out  of  the  Church  from  the 
Sacrament,  which  is  a  manifest  breach  of  the  Peace,  and 
contrary  to  the  Laws  in  that  case  made  and  provided,  and 
must  tend  to  the  discouragement  of  Religion,  and  the  Pub- 
lick  worship  of  God,  if  Persons  can’t  be  secure  at  the  Altar 
in  the  most  Solemn  Acts  of  Worship.”61 

In  his  reply,  dated  April  14,  1709,  Sonmans  defended  the 
legality  of  his  act  by  pointing  out  that  Barclay  had  refused  to 
answer  a  bill  filed  in  Chancery  against  him,  and  had  “stood  all 
the  contempts  of  the  said  Court  for  above  a  year,  mostly  shelter¬ 
ing  himself  in  your  Excellency’s  Government  of  New  York.”  A 
Commission  of  Rebellion  was  therefore  executed  against  him, 
and  his  arrest  on  a  Sunday  was  quite  proper,  inasmuch  as  he 
had  been  considered  a  rebel.62 

Lord  Lovelace’s  untimely  death  gave  Lieutenant-Governor 
Richard  Ingoldsby,  one  of  Cornbury’s  clique,  control  of  the 
situation.  He  deposed  Gordon  as  Chief  Justice  and  restored 

^Corresponding  Secretary,  National  Genealogical  Society. 

61Jbid.,  Ill,  p.  375. 

62Ibid.,  Ill,  p.  421. 


. 


* 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


255 


Mompesson.  John  Barclay  was  promptly  arrested,  on  the 
charge  of  tampering  with  the  provincial  records.63  Barclay 
was  imprisoned  for  failing  to  answer  the  bill  in  chancery  men¬ 
tioned  by  Sonmans,  from  June  3,  1708,  until  March  12,  1709. 64 

Ingoldsby’s  regime  abruptly  came  to  an  end  with  the  appoint¬ 
ment  of  the  just  and  fair-minded  Governor  Robert  Hunter,  a 
Scottish  soldier  who  had  seen  active  service  on  Europe’s  bat¬ 
tlefields.  In  a  letter  dated  from  Perth  Amboy,  “9br  Ist  1710”, 
John  Barclay  discussed  the  preparations  for  the  reception  of 
the  new  Governor.  The  person  to  whom  he  addressed  his 
letter  is  unknown,  but  he  was  evidently  an  official  of  high  rank 
in  the  Province  of  New  York.  Barclay  touched  upon  his  own 
personal  problems,  and  pleaded  for  assistance  in  warding  off 
the  charges  brought  against  him  by  Col.  Daniel  Coxe,  one  of 
Cornbury’s  former  supporters : 

“ . I  am  also  Informed  that  Coll.  Coxe  has  lately 

expressed  himselfe  very  maliciously  Against  me  telling  how 
severely  I  ought  to  be  dealt  with  &  showing  the  Evidences 
they  have  taken  against  me  so  that  if  he  &  Mr  Sonmans 
*  *  *  of  my  Judge  at  the  next  Supream  Court  I  must  be 
expected  to  be  prosecuted  as  if  I  had  done  what  they  accuse 
me  off  out  of  designe  &  for  a  reward  —  therefore  I  begg 
you  to  use  all  the  means  you  cann  that  if  its  possible  I  may 
not  be  so  violently  prosecuted. as  one  should  be  that  hadd 
been  guiltie  of  an  ill  thing  on  purpose  I  think  you  told 
me  you  thought  the  Cheefe  Justice  would  not  be  so  severe 
upon  me  so  I  leve  it  to  your  selfe  to  mention  me  to  him 
or  gett  any  one  Else  to  do  it  as  you  see  cause  or  if  you 
think  it  convenient  for  me  to  confess  the  matter  of  fact  so  as 
I  was  really  ledd  Into  it  &  what  advice  you  can  give  me  In 
this  unfortunate  affaire  I  wish  you  could  send  it  me  either 
in  writing  or  by  word  of  mouth  by  Mr  Raygneere65,  who 
is  my  friend.”66 

Mr.  Barclay  must  have  had  some  doubts  about  his  complete 
innocence  in  the  matter,  since,  as  the  above  extract  indicates, 

™Ibid.,  XIII,  p.  364. 

64Edwin  P.  Tanner,  Ph.D.,  The  Province  of  New  Jersey:  1664-1738 
(1908),  p.  617. 

Regnier. 

G6NJA,  1st  ser.,  IV,  13-14.  The  original  is  in  the  N.  Y.  Col.  MSS., 
Office  of  the  Secretary  of  State,  Albany,  N.  Y.,  vol.  LIV,  p.  90. 


•  ...  n  O'. rtf ■  <r  sby/ 

* 


256  Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 

he  believed  it  might  be  well  to  confess  that  he  was  led  into 
the  matter.  But  in  the  fall  term  (1711)  of  the  Supreme  Court 
he  was  tried  and  acquitted.67 

On  November  26,  1709,  Barclay  was  recommended  as  a 
member  of  Governor  Hunter’s  Council,  along  with  Thomas 
Gordon  and  others,  “being  Men  of  Estates  &  known  Integ¬ 
rity.”68  He  does  not  seem  to  have  occupied  that  position, 
although  his  friend  Gordon  was  elevated  to  the  Council,  but 
apparently  he  was  appointed  Clerk  of  the  Governor’s  Council, 
for  in  a  minute  of  January  21,  1714,  we  find  a  record69  of 
“John  Barclay  Esqr  now  Executing  the  Office  of  Clerk  to  this 
Board.”  Other  positions  that  he  occupied  were :  Clerk  of  the 
Peace  and  Clerk  of  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas  for  the  Coun¬ 
ties  of  Middlesex  and  Somerset  (appointed  Dec.  20,  1711, 
re-appointed  Jan.  21,  1714)  ;70  Justice  of  the  Peace  for  Middle¬ 
sex  and  Somerset  Counties  (commissioned  Sept.  28,  1713, 
re-commissioned  Jan.  21,  1714)  ;71  and  Surrogate  of  the  Eas¬ 
tern  Division  of  New  Jersey  (appointed  Aug.  7,  1716). 72  On 
August  24,  1718,  Perth  Amboy  was  incorporated  as  “The 
Mayor,  Recorder,  Aldermen  and  Commonalty  of  the  City  of 
Perth  Amboy”,  by  King  George  I.  Barclay  was  named  with 
Gordon  and  others  by  His  Majesty  as  being  among  the  principal 
inhabitants  of  the  place.73  Barclay  was  elected  the  first  Town 
Clerk  of  the  city  of  Perth  Amboy,  of  which  William  Eier  was 
the  first  Mayor.74 

The  dosing  years  of  the  old  gentleman’s  life  were  passed 
amid  the  peace  and  quiet  that  were  denied  him  in  his  youth. 
The  end  came  in  April,  1731,  in  his  Perth  Amboy  home,  and 
was  reported  as  follows  by  The  Boston  Weekly  News-Letter 
for  May  6-13,  1731 : 


67Tanner,  supra,  p.  491. 

™NJA,  III,  p.  498. 

69Ibid.,  XIII,  Journal  of  the  Governor  and  Council,  I,  p.  557. 

70Mrs.  Harry  Rogers  and  Mrs.  Alexander  H.  Lane,  “Abstracts  of  New 
Jersey  Commissions,  Civil  and  Military,  from  Liber  A.  A.  A.  of  Commis¬ 
sions,”  Publications  of  the  Genealogical  Society  of  Pennsylvania,  vol.  VII, 
pp.  1 55,  243. 

1'lbid.,  VII,  p.  237;  VIII,  p.  60. 

72Moffat,  supra,  p.  16  (Liber  C). 

73 Whitehead,  supra,  pp.  50-51. 

™Ibid.,  p.  53. 


'  • 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


257 


u  Philadelphia,  April  29.  Last  Week  died  at  Amboy 
John  Barclay  Esq ;  in  an  advanced  Age,  a  pious  man,  an 
excellent  Neighbour,  and  of  very  great  Service  to  the  Pub- 
lick,  but  more  particularly  where  he  lived,  and  is  very  much 
lamented  by  all  that  knew  him.  He  was  a  brother  to 
Robert  Barclay,  Laird  of  Ure  in  the  Kingdom  of  Scot¬ 
land,  the  famous  Quaker,  who  wrote  Barclay’s  Apology.”75 

There  has  been  much  discussion  regarding  the  identity  of 
John  Barclay’s  wife.  Some  descendants  have  held  that  she  was 
Cornelia  Van  Schaick  ;76  others,  confusing  her  with  his  mother 
or  his  daughter-in-law,  that  she  was  Katherine  Gordon.77  In 
deeds  of  December  23,  1699,  September  12,  1700,  and  Decem¬ 
ber  17,  1701,  John  Barclay’s  wife  is  stated78  to  have  been 
Katherine.  There  is  a  record79  of  a  Catharine  Barclay  as  having 
been  buried  at  Amboy  on  January  6,  1703,  and  as  we  hear  no 
more  of  Barclay’s  wife  after  that  year  we  may  conclude  that  she 
died  in  January,  1703,  and  wTas  laid  to  rest  on  the  day  stated. 
It  is  known  that  they  had  at  least  one  son,  John,  who  was 
born  at  Perth  Amboy  in  1702,  and  died  at  South  Amboy,  Feb¬ 
ruary  16,  1786,  and  who  was  married  twice,  firstly  to  Katherine, 
the  daughter  of  Charles  Gordon,  June  11,  1725;  and  secondly 
to  Jane  Van  Dyke,  1763. 80  No  other  children  heretofore  have 
been  found. 

The  writer  would  suggest  the  following  clues  to  the  possible 
parentage  of  Mrs.  Barclay,  which  likewise  indicate  that  besides 
John,  Jr.,  there  was  another  child,  a  daughter  Agnes.  On 
March  21,  1714,  George  Rescarrick,  of  Cranberry  Brook,  Mid¬ 
dlesex  County,  New  Jersey,  made  his  will,  in  which  he  left 
legacies  to  Agnis,  daughter  of  John  Barclay,  and  to  Thomas 
Gordon  and  his  wife  Janet  (Barclay’s  friends  and  relatives).81 

75 NJA ,  XI,  p.  243. 

76 Compendium  of  American  Genealogy  (F.  A.  Virkus,  editor),  I.  967. 
77Ibid.,  IV,  366;  V,  632. 

78NJA,  XXI,  pp.  306,  146,  320. 

79John  Edwin  Stillwell,  M.D.,  Historical  and  Genealogical  Miscellany. 
Data  Relating  to  the  Settlement  and  Settlers  of  New  York  and  New 
Jersey,  vol.  II  (1906),  p.  50. 

80Moffat,  supra,  p.  57.  The  genealogy  of  the  descendants  of  John  Bar¬ 
clay,  Jr.,  may  be  found  in  Moffat,  pp.  57-65,  and  is  fairly  complete  down 
to  1904. 

8 'NJA,  XXIII,  Abstracts  of  Wills,  I,  p.  381. 


. 


V*  fj 


.  . 

. 


258  Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 

On  February  15,  1728-9,  George  Rescarrick  (son  of  the  above 
George),  of  Perth  Amboy,  made  his  will,  bequeathing  a  legacy 
to  John  Barclay  junior.81  Mrs.  Barclay  had  died  in  1703,  so  of 
course  she  would  not  have  been  mentioned  among  the  children 
of  the  elder  George  Rescarrick  in  1714.  Her  son,  John  Bar¬ 
clay,  Jr.,  and  his  family  resided  at  Cranberry.  All  this  is  purely 
circumstantial  evidence — but  does  it  indicate  that  the  wife  of 
that  fine  old  Scottish  aristocrat,  John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy, 
was,  prior  to  her  marriage,  Katherine  Rescarrick? 

Genealogical  Notes 

(1)  Foreign  Branches :  The  house  of  Towie  seems  to  have 
been  the  parent  stem  of  many  foreign  families  of  distinction. 
William  Barclay  (1603-76),  of  this  branch,  entered  the  Swedish 
service,  rose  through  the  ranks  until  he  became  a  Colonel,  was 
ennobled  in  1648,  and  was  commissioned  a  Major-General  in 
the  army  in  1665.  His  line  became  extinct  in  1707  on  the  death 
of  his  grandson,  Capt.  Vilhelm  Barclay.62 

In  1621  the  brothers  Peter  and  John  Barclay,  of  Banff, 
described  in  a  letter  of  safe-conduct  as  members  of  the  same 
family  as  the  then  Laird  of  Towie,  Sir  Patrick  Barclay,  Knight, 
removed  to  the  town  of  Rostock,  in  Livland  (Livonia).  John 
afterwards  settled  in  Norway,  and  his  family  resided  there  for 
nearly  three  centuries,  until  the  death  of  his  last  male  represen¬ 
tative  in  1 907. 63 

John’s  brother  Peter  was  the  ancestor  of  the  Barclay  family 
of  Russia.  His  descendant,  August  Wilhelm  Barclay  (1752- 
-  1826),  of  Riga,  was  created  a  nobleman  of  the  Holy  Roman 
Empire  in  1792.  This  noble  branch  of  the  house  of  Barclay 
became  extinct  with  his  son,  George  Wilhelm.84  His  kins¬ 
man,  Weinhold  Gotthard  Barclay  (1734-81),  a  Livonian 
Knight,  had  three  sons.  The  eldest,  Maj.  Gen.  Erich  Johann 
Barclay,  was  the  father  of  Andreas  Otto  Heinrich  Barclay 
(1788-1851),  who  was  created  a  Finnish  Baron,  but  appar- 

82Gustaf  Magnus  Elgenstierna,  Den  Introducerade  Svenska  Adelns 
Attartavlor ,  I,  pp.  232-233. 

83 Barclay  Fam.  Hist.,  II,  239-240. 

**Ibid.,  II,  280. 


.  . 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


259 


ently  he  died  without  issue.85  Weinhold  Gotthard’s  second  son 
was  the  most  distinguished  member  of  the  Russian  branch, 
Michael  Andreas  Barclay  (1761-1818),  Governor  of  Finland 
in  1809.  In  1813  Czar  Alexander  I  granted  him  the  title  of 
Count  Barclay  de  Tolly,86  and  on  August  30,  1815,  his  ser¬ 
vices  as  a  soldier  were  further  recognized  by  his  elevation  to  the 
exalted  dignity  of  Prince  Barclay  de  Tolly.  He  held  the  high 
rank  of  a  Field  Marshal  in  the  Imperial  Army.  The  title  be¬ 
came  extinct  in  1871  on  the  death  of  his  son,  the  second  Prince, 
Ernst  Magnus,  but  it  was  revived  the  following  year  in  favor 
of  the  Von  Weymarn  family,  which  descended  from  a  sister 
of  the  first  Prince.87  The  present  representative  of  the  Russian 
branch  is  Prince  Nicholas  Barclay  de  Tolly- Weymarn,  who  re¬ 
sides  at  his  castle,  Stenfors,  near  Tingsryd,  in  Sweden.88 

(2)  Barclay  of  Urie  and  Bury  Hill :  Robert  Barclay,  The 
Apologist,  Governor  of  East  New  Jersey,  was  born  Dec.  23, 
1648,  and  died  Oct.  3,  1690.  He  married  Christian,  daughter 
of  Gilbert  and  Margaret  Mollisom89  Mrs.  Barclay  died  Dec. 
14,  1722.  Their  children  were:  Robert  (1672-1747),  3rd 
Laird  of  Urie,  m.  Elizabeth  Braine;  David  (1682-1769),  of 
London,  m.  (1)  Anne  Taylor,  and  (2)  Priscilla  Freame;  John 
(1687-1751),  of  Dublin,  Ireland,  m.  (1)  Margaret  Wilson, 
and  (2)  Anne  Strettell ;  Patience,  m.  Timothy  Forbes;  Cath¬ 
erine,  m.  James  Forbes ;  Christian,  m.  Alexander  JafFray  of 
Kingswells ;  and  Jean,  m.  Alexander  Forbes.90 

In  1722  Robert,  3rd  Laird  of  Urie,  executed  a  “disposition 
and  deed  of  entail,”  whereby  he  stipulated  that  the  Barony  of 
Urie  should  be  inherited  in  turn  by  the  heirs  of  his  sons  and  his 

85Ibid.,  II,  284-285. 

86“Tolly”  is  not  merely  a  Russian  corruption  of  the  original  “Towie” 
but  is  a  form  that  frequently  occurs  in  ancient  Scottish  records.  Towie 
is  near  Banff,  Aberdeenshire. 

87The  Marquis  de  Ruvigny,  The  Titled  Nobility  of  Europe  (1914), 
p.  298. 

88 Almanack  de  Gotha  (1938),  p.  397. 

89Members  of  the  Mollison  family  settled  in  East  Jersey  in  1684-5. 

"Barclay  Fam.  Hist.,  Ill,  191.  Among  Governor  Barclay’s  de¬ 
scendants  is  Mrs.  Katherine  J.  (Barclay)  Dimsdale,  of  Meesden  Manor, 
Buntingford,  Hertfordshire,  England,  mother  of  the  Baron  Dimsdale 
of  the  Russian  Empire,  whose  West  Jersey  ancestor  was  treated  in  the 
author’s  article,  “Dr.  Robert  Dimsdale :  Poineer  Physician  and  Colonial 
Legislator,”  Procs.  N.  J.  Hist.  Soc.,  April,  1939,  pp.  98-107. 


. 

■ 


260  Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 

brothers,  but,  should  their  lines  fail,  the  lordship  was  to  devolve 
upon  his  uncle,  John  Barclay,  then  in  New  Jersey,  and  his 
heirs.91  His  grandson,  Robert  (1731-97),  the  5th  Laird,  as¬ 
sumed  the  additional  surname  of  Allardice  on  the  occasion  of 
his  second  marriage.  His  son,  Capt.  Robert  Barclay-Allardice 
(i779~i854),  early  in  the  19th  century  secured  a  release  of  cer¬ 
tain  lands  from  the  entail  of  1722  by  an  Act  of  Parliament  and 
the  consent  of  the  Barclay  family  of  East  New  Jersey.  A  vast 
amount  of  interesting  correspondence  passed  between  the  rep¬ 
resentatives  of  the  British  and  American  branches,  and  these 
documents  are  still  carefully  preserved  in  the  Barclay  Archives 
at  Bury  Hill,  Surrey.92  Capt.  Barclay-Allardice  had  no  male 
issue ;  his  daughter  Margaret,  who  was  twice  married,  assumed 
the  name  of  Barclay-Allardice,  and  her  descendants,  who  rep¬ 
resent  the  family  in  the  female  lines  but  still  continue  to  bear 
the  nan>e,  reside  in  Canada  and  the  United  States. The  present 
Chief  of  the  House  of  Barclay  is  Lieut.  Col.  Robert  Wyvill 
Barclay,  of  Bury  Hill,  Surrey,  England,  a  lineal  descendant  of 
David  Barclay,  of  London,  the  second  son  of  The  Apologist. 

(3)  Sir  Ezven  Cameron  of  Lochiel :  In  1685  this  gallant 
Highland  chieftain  became  the  brother-in-law  of  John  Barclay 
of  Perth  Amboy  by  reason  of  his  marriage  to  Jean  Barclay, 
who  was  his  third  wife.93  Perhaps  the  finest  characterization 
of  him  ever  written  was  the  following  masterly  description  by 
Lord  Macaulay:94 

.  .  Sir  Ewan  Cameron,  of  Lochiel,  surnamed  the  Black, 
was  in  personal  qualities  unrivalled  among  the  Celtic  princes. 

91Moffat,  supra,  pp.  17-18. 

92 1 bid.,  17-40. 

93His  previous  wives  were :  ( 1 )  Mary,  dau.  of  Sir  Donald  Macdonald, 
of  Slate,  1st  Bart,  (no  issue),  and  (2)  a  dau.  of  Sir  Lachlan  Maclean, 
1st  Bart.  (3  sons  and  4  daus.,  of  whom  the  eldest  was  John  Cameron, 
18th  Chief  of  Lochiel).  Sir  Ewen’s  issue  by  Jean  Barclay  were:  Ludo- 
vick;  Christian,  m.  Alan  Cameron,  of  Glendessary;  Jean,  m.  Lachlan 
Macpherson,  25th  Chief  of  Cluny ;  Isabel,  m.  Archibald  Cameron,  of 
Dungallon ;  Lucy,  m.  Patrick  Campbell,  of  Barcaldine ;  Ket,  m.  John 
Campbell,  of  Achalader-  Una,  m.  Robert  Barclay,  4th  Laird  of  Urie; 
and  Marjorie,  m.  Macdonald  of  Morar. 

®4Thomas  Babington  Macaulay,  The  History  of  England  from  the 
Accession  of  James  the  Secotid  (edited  by  Charles  Harding  Firth,  M. 
A.),  vol.  IV  (1914),  PP-  1597-1598. 


■ 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy  261 

He  was  a  gracious  master,  a  trusty  ally,  a  terrible  enemy. 
.  .  .  Lochiel  was  tall  and  strongly  built.  In  agility  and  skill  at 
his  weapons  he  had  few  equals  among  the  inhabitants  of  the 
hills.  He  had  repeatedly  been  victorious  in  single  combat.  He 
was  a  hunter  of  great  fame.  He  made  vigorous  war  on  the 
wolves  which,  down  to  his  time,  preyed  on  the  red  deer  of  the 
Grampians;  and  by  his  hand  perished  the  last  of  the  ferocious 
breed  which  is  known  to  have  wandered  at  large  in  our  islands, 
.  .  .  he  was  eminently  wise  in  council,  eloquent  in  debates,  ready 
in  devising  expedients,  and  skilfull  in  managing  the  minds  of 
men.  ...  In  truth,  the  character  of  this  great  chief  was  depicted 
two  thousand  five  hundred  years  before  his  birth,  and  depicted 
— such  is  the  power  of  genius — in  colours  which  will  be  fresh 
as  many  years  after  his  death.  He  was  the  Ulysses  of  the 
Highlands.”05 

It  is  strange  that  few  historians  have  recognized  the  mighty 
Sir  Ewen  Cameron  as  an  extensive  landowner  in  New  Jersey. 
His  official  biographer00  is  silent  on  the  subject,  which  is  not 
touched  upon  by  the  Barclay  Family  History,  even  in  connec¬ 
tion  with  the  Barclay  holdings  there,  although  he  is  frequently 
mentioned  in  that  work.  The  fact  that  Sir  Ewen  left  no  known 
descendants  in  East  Jersey  probably  accounts  for  Whitehead 
overlooking  him  in  his  books  on  East  Jersey  and  Perth  Am¬ 
boy.  Monnette  is  the  only  historian  (so  far  as  the  writer  is 
aware)  who  does  mention97  him  as  a  proprietor,  but  he  does 
not  describe  his  exploits.  This  is  most  unusual,  for  the  late 
distinguished  chronicler  of  the  Piscataway  settlement  rarely 
missed  an  opportunity  for  detailed  information  regarding  celeb¬ 
rities  of  the  period  treated  in  his  work. 

As  a  matter  of  fact,  Sir  Ewen  became  as  intensely  interested 
in  colonizing  the  province  as  his  three  brothers-in-law,  Robert, 

95For  the  story  of  Lochiel’s  quarrel  with  the  Duke  of  Gordon  and  how 
his  brother-in-law  Robert  Barclay,  The  Apologist,  came  to  his  aid,  see 
the  Memoirs  of  Sir  Ewen  Cameron  of  Locheill,  Chief  of  the  Clan  Cam¬ 
eron  (Publications  of  The  Abbotsford  Club,  Nov.  24,  1842),  pp.  217-218, 
222-228. 

96The  anonymous  author  of  the  Memoirs  of  Sir  Ewen  Cameron  wrote 
his  work  a  few  years  after  Lochiel’s  death,  but  it  was  not  published  until 
1842. 

97Orra  Eugene  Monnette,  B.  A.,  LL.D.,  First  Settlers  of  Ye  Plantations 
of  Piscatau'ay  and  Woodbridae,  Olde  East  New  Jersey,  1664-1714,  pt. 
Ill,  P-  347,  Pt.  VI,  p.  1069. 


■ 


i$b*n9tr*’  r>s  3m-  i^d  nw/3  v<  nrf  k  i  itum  a  <U\ 


262  Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 

John  and  David  Barclay,  and  he  acquired  numerous  tracts  of 
land  in  East  New  Jersey,  including  2000  acres  in  Middlesex 
County,  a  town  lot  in  Perth  Amboy,  and  a  parcel  in  Monmouth 
County.98 

(4)  Royal  Descent:  John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy  is  one  of 
the  comparatively  few  American  immigrants  with  a  proved 
royal  pedigree.  The  genealogy  of  the  royal  house  of  Scotland 
is  well  known  and  may  be  verified  in  any  standard  history  of 
the  country  or  of  the  family,  but  the  following  lineage  from 
Robert  I  to  James  IV  is  based  chiefly  on  The  Scots  Peerage,  I, 
pp.  15-22.  The  descent  from  James  IV  to  John  Barclay  is  ac¬ 
companied  by  documentary  evidence.  The  other  royal  families 
given  below  are  derived  principally  from  C.  M.  Allstrom’s  Dic¬ 
tionary  of  Royal  Lineage  in  Europe  (2  vols.,  1904).  So  far  as 
the  writer  knows,  this  is  the  first  publication  (with  proofs)  of 
the  descent  of  the  American  family  of  Barclay  from  King 
James  IV. 

1.  Robert  I  (1274-1329),  King  of  Scots  (1306-29),  of  the 
House  of  Bruce;  m.  (1)  Isabel,  dau.  of  Donald,  6th  Earl  of 
Mar,  by  Ellen,  dau.  of  Llewelyn,  Prince  of  North  Wales,  and 
wid.  of  Malcolm,  Earl  of  Fife. 

2.  Marjorie ;  m.  Walter,  6th  High  Steward  of  Scotland. 

3.  Robert  II  (1316-90),  King  of  Scots  (1371-90)  ;  the  first 
monarch  of  the  House  of  Stuart  (Stewart)  ;  m.  (1)  Elizabeth, 
dau.  of  Sir  Adam  Mure,  of  Rowallan. 

4.  Robert  III  (1337-1406),  King  of  Scots  (1390-1406)  ;  m. 
Annabelle,  dau.  of  Sir  John  Drummbnd,  of  Stobhall. 

5.  James  I  (1394-1437),  King  of  Scots  (1406-37)  ;  m.  Joan, 
dau.  of  John,  1st  Earl  of  Somerset  (of  the  House  of  Beaufort), 
grandda.  of  John  of  Gaunt,  Duke  of  Lancaster,  and  great- 
grandda.  of  Edward  III,  King  of  England,  of  the  illustrious 
House  of  Plantagenet.  Edward  III  was  a  son  of  Edward 
II  by  Isabella,  dau.  of  Philip  IV,  The  Fair,  King  of  France 
(grandson  of  the  celebrated  King,  St.  Louis  IX).  Edward 
II  was  a  son  of  Edward  I  of  England  (d.  1307)  and  his  first 
wife,  Eleonora,  dau.  of  Ferdinand  III  (The  Saint),  King  of 


9SNJA,  1st  ser.,  XXI,  p.  81. 


■ 


263 


John  Barclay  oj  Perth  Amboy 

Castile  and  Leon."  Ferdinand  III  was  a  descendant  of  the 
most  romantic  hero  in  all  Spanish  history,  Rodrigo  Diaz  de 
Bivar,  commonly  called  The  Cid  (d.  1099). 

6.  James  II  (1430-60),  King  of  Scots  (1437-60)  ;  m.  Maria, 
dau.  of  Arnulf,  Duke  of  Gelderland,  by  his  second  wife  Cathar¬ 
ine,  dau.  of  Adolf  II,  Duke  of  Cleves,  and  his  second  wife,  Maria, 
dau.  of  John  the  Fearless,  Duke  of  Burgundy,  a  paternal  grand¬ 
son  of  John  II,  King  of  France  (d.  1361). 

7.  James  III  (1451-1488),  King  of  Scots  (1460-88);  m. 
Margaret,  dau.  of  Christian  I,  King  of  Denmark  from  1448 
to  1481,  of  Norway  from  1460  to  1481,  and  of  Sweden  from 
1457  to  1464,  and  his  wife,  Dorothea,  wid.  of  Christopher  III 
of  Denmark,  and  dau.  of  Johann  the  Alchemist,  Markgraf  of 
Ansbach-Bayreuth,  and  his  wife,  Barbara  of  Saxony,  and 
grandda.  of  Friedrich  I,  Elector  of  Brandenburg,  of  the  House 
of  Hohenzollern.  Johann  the  Alchemist’s  wife,  Barbara,  was 
a  dau.  of  Rudolf  III,  Elector  of  Saxony,  the  son  of  Elector 
Wenceslas,  grandson  of  Elector  Rudolf  I,  and  great-grandson 
of  Elector  Albrecht  II,  of  Saxony,  and  his  wife  Agnes,  dau. 
of  the  German  King,  Rudolf  I,  Count  of  Habsburg  (d.  1291). 
This  is  believed  to  be  the  first  discovery  oj  a  New  Jersey  fam¬ 
ily's  authentic  descent  from  the  founders  of  the  later  imperial 
houses  of  Hohenzollern  and  Habsburg. 

8.  James  IV  (1473-1513),  King  of  Scots  (1488-1513)  ;100 
by  his  mistress,  Margaret,  dau.  of  John,  1st  Lord  Drummond, 
had  the  following : 

9.  Margaret  (called  also  Jane,  in  some  accounts)  ;  m.  John, 
Lord  Gordon,  Master  of  Huntly,  the  son  and  heir  of  Alexander, 
3rd  Earl  of  Huntly,  and  his  wife,  Jean  Stewart,  dau.  of  John, 
1st  Earl  of  Atholl  (d.  1512),  and  his  first  wife,  Margaret,  dau. 
of  Archibald,  5th  Earl  of  Douglas,  in  Scotland,  and  2nd  Duke 
of  Touraine,  in  France  (d.  1439),  son  °f  Archibald,  4th  Earl 
of  Douglas  and  his  wife,  Margaret,  eldest  dau.  of  Robert  III, 

"John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy  was  descended  from  at  least  four 
“saints”:  St  Margaret  of  England  (wife  of  Malcolm  III  of  Scotland), 
St.  David  of  Scotland,  St.  Louis  of  France,  and  St.  Ferdinand  of  Castile. 

100King  James  IV’s  lawful  wife  was  Margaret,  dau.  of  Henry  VII 
of  England,  by  whom  he  had  James  V,  wrhose  dau.  Mary  Queen  of 
Scots  wras  the  mother  of  James  VI  of  Scotland  (James  I  of  England). 


■ 


264  Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 

King  of  Scots.  John,  1st  Earl  of  Atholl  (above),  was  a  son  of 
Sir  James  Stewart,  the  Black  Knight  of  Lorn,  and  his  wife, 
Lady  Joan  Beaufort,  wid.  of  James  I.  Her  descent  from  Ed¬ 
ward  III  has  been  outlined  above.101 

Proof  of  the  parentage  of  Margaret  (Stewart)  Gordon:  26 
April,  1510,  King  James  IV  granted  to  John,  Lord  Gordon, 
son  and  heir  apparent  of  Alexander,  Earl  of  Huntly,  etc., 
and  to  his  daughter  Margaret  Stewart ,  wife  of  the  said  John, 
the  lands  and  lordship  of  Badenoch,  with  the  house  and  castle 
of  Ruthven  in  Badenoch,  etc.  (“Rex  concessit  Johanni  Domino 
Gordoun,  filio  et  apparenti  heredi  Alexandri  com.  de  Huntlie 
&c,  et  filio  sue  Margarcte  Stewart  sponsi  dicti  Joli., — terras  et 
dominium  de  Baidyenach,  cum  domo  et  castro  de  Ruthven  in 
Baidyenach,”  etc.)102 

10.  Alexander  Gordon  (d.  1575),  titular  Archbishop  of  Ath¬ 
ens  ;  Bishop  of  the  Isles ;  Bishop  of  Galloway ;  the  only  Scot¬ 
tish  prelate  to  joint  the  reformers  (1560). 103 

Proof  that  he  was  a  brother  of  George,  4th  Earl  of  Huntley, 
and  a  son,  therefore,  of  John,  Lord  Gordon,  and  his  wife,  Mar¬ 
garet  Stewart:  Oct.  14,  1544:  “Ane  Letter  maid  to  Maister 
Alexander  Gordoun,  bruthir  germane  to  George,  Earl  of  Hunt- 
lie,  his  airis  and  assignais,”  granting  him  certain  lands,  benefices 
and  churches  in  the  Bishopric  of  Caithness.104  By  a  concubine, 
Barbara  Logie,  he  had : 

11.  John  Gordon,  D.D.  (1544-1619),  Bishop  of  Galloway, 
in  Scotland,  and  Dean  of  Salisbury,  in  England ;  Laird  of  Glen- 
luce,  in  Scotland,  and  Sieur  de  Longorme,  in  France.105 

Proofs  of  his  parentage:  (1)  At  Edinburgh,  26  Sept.,  1553* 
Mary  Queen  of  Scots  gave  letters  of  legitimation  to  John  and 

101See  also  The  Scots  Peerage,  articles  “Huntly,”  “Atholl”  and  “Doug¬ 
las.” 

102Registrum  Magni  Sigilli  Regum  Scotorum :  The  Register  of  the 
Great  Seal  of  Scotland,  1424-15 13,  p.  740,  no.  3452. 

103DNB,  XXII,  pp.  159-161. 

104Registrum  Secreti  Sigilli  Rsgum  Scotorum :  The  Register  of  the 
Privy  Seal  of  Scotland,  vol.  Ill,  p.  144,  no.  919. 

10 5DNB,  XXII,  pp.  212-214. 


John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy 


265 


Alexander  Gordon,  natural 106  sons  of  Master  Alexander  Gor¬ 
don.  (“Regina  dedit  litteras  legitimationis  Joanni  Gordoun  et 
Alexandro  Gordoun  bastardis,  filiis  naturalibus  M.  Alexandri 
G”)107  (2)  At  Linlithgow,  Dec.  8,  1585,  King  James  VI  con¬ 
firmed  a  charter  of  certain  lands  formerly  held  by  Alexander 
Gordon,  Archbishop  of  Athens,  to  John  Gordon ,  son  of  the  said 
Alexander.  (“Rex  confirmavit  cartam  factam  per  quon¬ 
dam  Alex,  archiepisc.  Athenien.  .  .  .  Joanni  Goirdoun .  filio 
dicti  Alex.”)108 

Dr.  John  Gordon  married  (2)  1594,  Genevieve,  dau.  of  Gid¬ 
eon  Petau,  Sieur  de  Maule,  in  France,  and  had : 

12.  Louise  (called  also  Lucy)  Gordon  (1597-1680);  m. 
Sir  Robert  Gordon,  1st  Baronet,  of  Gordonstoun. 

Proofs  of  her  parentage:  (1)  Will  of  her  father,  Dr.  John 
Gordon,  Sept.  16,  1618:  “In  the  Name  of  God  the  Eternail, 
called  in  the  Hebrew,  Jehovah  Elohim,  ...  I,  Jean  Gordon, 
borne  in  Scotland,  of  the  House  of  Huntly,  Doctor  of  Divinitie. 
and  Deane  of  the  Cathedrall  Church  of  Salisburie,  .  .  .  refer  the 
disposition  of  all  that  I  have  in  ffraunce,  to  the  donation  which 
I  have  made  heretofore  to  Geneviev  Petaw,  my  loving  wife, 
and  to  Sir  Robert  Gordon,  and  Lucie  Gordon,  my  only  childe, 
his  wife;  .  .  ,109  (2)  Sir  Robert  Gordon’s  own  statement,  writ¬ 

ten  in  the  third  person:  “The  yeir  of  God,  1613,  the  16th  day 
of  February,  Sir  Robert  Gordoun  (the  Earle  of  Sutherland  his 
brother)  mareid  Louyse  Gordoun,  the  only  daughter  and  heyre 
of  John  Gordoun,  Lord  of  Longormes,  and  Dean  of  Sallisbury; 
a  lady  then  of  the  aige  of  15  years  and  two  moneths.  .  .  .  This 


10t5This  bit  of  documentary  evidence  proves  conclusively  that  Arch¬ 
bishop  Gordon  never  was  lawfully  married  to  Barbara  Logie,  as  stated 
by  the  DNB,  XXII,  p.  160,  and  The  Scots  Peerage,  IV,  p.  533.  As  addi¬ 
tional  proof  his  dau.  Barbara  was  legitimated  on  Nov.  6,  1553.  (Reg. 
Mag,  Sig.  Reg.  Sc.:  1546-1580,  p.  192,  no.  858).  Dr.  John  Gordon’s  name 
was  inadvertently  omitted  as  a  son  of  the  Archbishop  in  the  Huntly 
article  in  the  Peerage,  but  was  added  in  the  “Addenda  et  Corrigenda,” 
IX,  p.  no. 

101  Reg.  Mag.  Sig.  Reg.  Sc.:  1546-1580,  p.  190,  no.  848. 

108Ibid.,  1580-1593,  pp.  289-290,  no.  900. 

109Capt.  Edward  Dunbar-Dunbar,  Social  Life  in  Fortner  Days  (1865), 
pp.  284-285,  289. 


. 


266 


Proceedings  New  Jersey  Historical  Society 


John  Gordoun,  Lord  of  Longormes,  wes  the  eldest  sone  of 
Alexr.  Gordonn,  Bishop  of  Galloway.”110 

13.  Katherine  Gordon;  m.  Col.  David  Barclay,  1st  Laird 
of  Urie. 

Proof  of  her  parentage:  December,  1647:  contract  of  mar¬ 
riage  between  “Major  David  Barclay,  lawfull  sone  to  David 
Barclay  of  Maeteris,”  and  “maisteres  Kathrein  Gordune,  eldest 
lawfull  docter  to  Sir  Robert  Gordune  of  Gordunestoune,  Knycht 
Baronet.”111 

14.  John  Barclay  of  Perth  Amboy,  East  New  Jersey.112 

(Editor’s  Note — We  regret  that,  due  to  a  printer's  error 
discovered  too  late  for  correction,  part  of  a  paragraph  in  the 
July  installment  of  this  article  zvas  misplaced.  The  first  six 
lines  on  page  208  should  precede  the  word  ‘‘Keith,”  the  first 
word  on  page  205,  leaving  the  seventh  line  on  page  208  to  fol- 
lozv  the  last  line  on  page  20 7). 


STANHOPE  FORGES  AND  FURNACES 
SUSSEX  COUNTY 

BY  MOSES  BIGELOW,  NEW  YORK  CITY 

On  Musconetcong  River,  about  halfway  between  Brookland 
Forge,  at  the  outlet  of  Hopatcong  Lake,  and  Andover  Forge,  at 
Waterloo,  one  mile  below  the  mouth  of  Lubbers  Run;  Jonathan 
Dickerson  built  the  “Upper  Forge”  at  Stanhope,  in  1780. 

On  a  monument,  in  the  burying  ground  of  the  Presbyterian 
Church  at  Morristown,  is  this  inscription : 

“Peter  Dickerson,  member  of  the  First  Provincial  Congress  of 
New  Jersey,  1775,  Captain  of  the  2nd  Company,  3rd  Regiment  of 
the  New  Jersey  Brigade  of  the  Revolutionary  Army  in  1776. 
Whs  born  in  Southold,  L.  I.  in  1724,  removed  to  Morris  County 
with  brothers  Thomas,  Joshua,  Daniel  and  one  sister  Elizabeth, 
about  1745,  and  died  May  10,  1780,  in  his  56th  year.” 

110Sir  Robert  Gordon,  A  Genealogical  History  of  the  Earldom  of 
Sutherland,  p.  289. 

11:lAlexander  Gordon,  “The  Great  Laird  of  Urie,”  Theological  Revieiv, 
Oct,  1874,  p.  537. 

112The  proofs  of  his  parentage  have  already  been  given. 


.